KIPULSE · ENGINEERING
The engineering department audit examines requirements, design, calculation, testing, documentation and engineering knowledge. It quantifies the time held in these processes – and states for every measure what a person has to decide.
Start free AI quick check How the AI audit worksThe department audit covers all eleven areas of engineering. Each one is quantified separately: volume, effort per case, annual hours, annual cost and the share that can responsibly be relieved. Every assumption is disclosed alongside.
What the audit examines
Irrelevant areas are skipped and do not affect your result. The audit only asks what actually applies to your business.
How the audit works
Your audit is tailored to your industry.
The adaptive audit analyses your actual processes and adjusts follow-up questions to your answers.
KIPulse identifies relevant AI and automation potential for your business.
You receive concrete next steps, sorted by priority.
Why KIPulse
The analysis takes into account processes typical for your industry.
The analysis adapts to your answers.
Not just AI use, but processes, data, digitalisation, automation and other factors are considered.
Potential is assessed not only technically, but in terms of time, effort and benefit.
The result delivers concrete priorities instead of generic recommendations.
Concrete benefit
The savings potential is calculated from your answers in the audit, no invented or generic figures.
Frequently asked questions
Documents are built from the bill of materials, the specification and the design revision – and have to be updated by hand after every change. Release still rests with a person. In the audit for Engineering this is a dedicated area: you answer questions taken from your everyday work, and the result shows where automation can realistically help here.
Besides the Technical documentation area, it covers Knowledge and standards and Calculation and simulation, among others. In total the audit spans 11 areas from the configuration for Engineering – services you do not offer are skipped by the questionnaire.
Yes. Your maturity score is set against the average of the audits already completed in the same sector. As long as too few audits are available for that, the result shows a neutral reference value and labels it explicitly as such, no invented sector statistics.
For heads of engineering, heads of design and technical directors who want to know how much working time their processes actually tie up. It is industry-neutral: mechanical engineering, plant construction, automotive, electronics, medical devices, aerospace, rail, software.
What matters is what you want examined, not what you manufacture. The industry audit looks at the company as a whole, the engineering audit at a standalone engineering department. As a rule of thumb: below roughly thirty employees the industry audit usually fits; from an engineering function of five people upwards, this one does. If you know the industry audit as a mechanical engineering company, engineering office, industrial company or IT service provider, this is the deep dive into that one department.
No. It assesses process, effort, frequency and data availability – never design, sizing, calculation results, material choice or product quality. The report says how long something takes and where effort arises, not whether it is correct.
They are trade secrets and do not belong in freely accessible services. Every measure that processes technical content names the protection required and an implementation that preserves it: self-hosted models, your own data centre, or contractually secured processing within the European area. For many engineering departments this is the decisive point of the report.
You get a range, not a single number, and alongside it every assumption behind it. From answer steps such as "4 to 16 hours per case" no exact amount can be derived. The benefit shown is engineering time released, not headcount saved.
These four industries often run their own engineering department. If you want to examine the entire company rather than the development department alone, one of these audits is the right one.